In the few threads and conversations I've witnessed about this topic, the resistance I see to this push is mostly passive. The large majority of taiko players don't personally want to do things to make taiko more mainstream, even if they wouldn't mind the increased exposure for taiko overall. I don't think that's a bad mindset to have, but it's something to be aware of.
Let's take a look at some of the possibilities of mainstreaming taiko:
- More demand of taiko performances, which means more paying gigs for taiko groups.
- More opportunities to collaborate with mainstream artists, which can push taiko into new forms and outlets.
- More drum makers and equipment, possibly more affordable as well.
- Professional taiko players and groups more viable.
- Larger community for support and resources.
- A flood of cookie-cutter taiko groups.
- Harder for audiences to distinguish "quality" taiko.
- Less opportunities for you/your group to play because there are so many other groups out there.
- Foundations that rank your group at the bottom due to politics or bias.
So here's my question for you. Would you rather see more exposure, more acceptance, and more taiko, if it meant less quality and less opportunities for you?
I'm not sure I agree that more exposure to taiko would make it more difficult for audiences to appreciate "quality" taiko.
ReplyDeleteI think audiences tend to be easily impressed because of the novelty of taiko. I have seen a couple of dull groups with inexplicably excited audiences. I've seen people utterly blown away if a group ends a song together with a nice pose, or when someone strikes an oodaiko just once with good form. Get people used to watching taiko, and it will take more to impress them; teach them a bit of taiko and they will develop a new kind of appreciation.